noesisnoesis
Джерело

Глосарій психологічних конструктів

203 конструктів, які вимірюють інструменти цього каталогу, кожен з визначенням і посиланням на теорію, з якої він походить. За алфавітом.

#

Активне подолання
Taking concrete steps to remove or reduce a stressor, concentrating effort on doing something about the situation (Carver, 1997). A problem-focused strategy in the transactional model (Lazarus & Folkman, 1984); it relates to lower distress in adjustment research (Carver, 1997).

З теорії Транзакційна модель копінгу →

Альтруїзм
Vocational interest in work whose result is another person being better off — teaching, care, counselling, service (Pozzebon et al., 2010). A low score says nothing about whether the person is kind, only that helping is not what they want the working day to consist of.

З теорії Професійні інтереси →

Амотивація
The absence of any intention to act: the person no longer sees a connection between what they do and what it returns (Vallerand et al., 1992). A construct of its own on the self-determination continuum, not the reverse of the six motivations, and read inverted from them — a high score is a signal worth respecting, not a trait to develop.

З теорії Теорія самодетермінації →

Аналіз
Vocational interest in the sciences, mathematics, and problems that hold still long enough to be taken apart (Pozzebon et al., 2010). High scorers want the mechanism, not just the outcome; a low score is common in people entirely capable of the work who would rather spend the day doing something else.

З теорії Професійні інтереси →

Безоціночність щодо внутрішнього досвіду
Taking a non-evaluative stance toward one's thoughts and feelings — not labeling them as good or bad (Baer et al., 2006).

З теорії П'ятиаспектна модель усвідомленості →

Безсердечний (DE)
Low affiliation — emotionally detached, unsympathetic, uninterested in others (Wiggins, 1995).

З теорії Міжособистісний циркумплекс →

Вдячність
The character strength of being aware of and thankful for the good things that happen (Peterson & Seligman, 2004). It is a habit of noticing rather than a mood, and it is one of the strengths that tends to move with practice.

З теорії Класифікація сильних сторін характеру «Цінності в дії» →

Вертикальна довіра
Trust between management and employees, in both directions — whether management trusts the employees to do their work well, whether the employees can trust the information coming from management, and whether views and feelings can be expressed upward (Burr et al., 2019).

З теорії Психосоціальні фактори праці →

Вживання психоактивних речовин
Using alcohol or other substances to feel better or to get through the situation (Carver, 1997). An emotion-focused avoidance strategy; heavy reliance on it is the coping pattern most often flagged as warranting attention.

З теорії Транзакційна модель копінгу →

Вивільнення емоцій
Expressing negative feelings and letting emotions out to relieve distress (Carver, 1997). An emotion-focused strategy: it can release pressure without in itself addressing the demand that produced it.

З теорії Транзакційна модель копінгу →

Вигорання, пов'язане з клієнтами
Physical and psychological fatigue and exhaustion perceived as attributed to working with clients, patients, or other people served (Kristensen et al., 2005).

З теорії Теорія вигорання →

Вигорання, пов'язане з роботою
Physical and psychological fatigue and exhaustion perceived as attributed to one's work (Kristensen et al., 2005).

З теорії Теорія вигорання →

Визнання
Whether one's work is recognized and appreciated by the management. Measured by a single item in the COPSOQ III middle version, it reads whether sustained effort visibly registers above (Burr et al., 2019).

З теорії Психосоціальні фактори праці →

Використання емоцій
The ability to direct emotion toward constructive activity and personal performance (Mayer & Salovey, 1997; Wong & Law, 2002): turning enthusiasm into a started task, frustration into another attempt, pressure into focus. The least discussed of the four dimensions and the most visible in what actually gets done.

З теорії Чотиривимірний емоційний інтелект →

Вимоги щодо приховування емоцій
The requirement to conceal feelings and keep opinions unexpressed at work — staying kind regardless of how one is treated. It names the self-containment load carried by many people-facing roles (Burr et al., 2019).

З теорії Психосоціальні фактори праці →

Випадок
Belief that luck, fate, and chance determine outcomes (Levenson, 1981).

З теорії Локус контролю →

Виробництво
Vocational interest in growing, building, repairing, and working with tools, land, and animals — the most physical of the eight ORVIS interests (Pozzebon et al., 2010). It describes wanting the day to end with something concrete to point at.

З теорії Професійні інтереси →

Високі очікування щодо результативності
The leader behavior of demanding excellence and refusing second-best work (Podsakoff, MacKenzie, Moorman & Fetter, 1990). The construct measures the size of the demand, not its wisdom: the same level of demand reads as belief when it arrives with individualized support and as pressure when it does not, which is why it is interpreted next to that behavior rather than on its own.

З теорії Трансформаційна поведінка лідера →

Відвага/Хоробрість
The character strength of not shrinking from threat, challenge, or difficulty, and of speaking up for what is right even when it costs (Peterson & Seligman, 2004). The price is what separates it from simply having opinions.

З теорії Класифікація сильних сторін характеру «Цінності в дії» →

Відданість
The significance facet of work engagement: being strongly involved in one's work and experiencing it as meaningful, with enthusiasm, inspiration, and pride (Schaufeli & Bakker, 2003). It is the facet most resistant to bad weeks and the most serious when it goes — energy can be rebuilt with rest, but meaning rarely returns by resting.

З теорії Залученість до роботи →

Відданість працівників безпеці
The workgroup's shared perception of its own commitment to safety — whether workers treat safety as their own responsibility, help each other work safely, and take initiative, rather than leaving safety to rules and inspectors (Kines et al., 2011). It is the dimension most shaped by group history and by what the group visibly tolerates.

З теорії Клімат безпеки праці →

Відкритість до досвіду

Також відомо як: Openness

A Big Five personality dimension reflecting the tendency to be intellectually curious, imaginative, and receptive to novel experiences, encompassing facets such as aesthetic sensitivity, fantasy, attentiveness to inner feelings, preference for variety, and willingness to examine unconventional ideas (Costa & McCrae, 1992). Individuals high in Openness actively seek out new aesthetic, cultural, and intellectual experiences, while those low on this dimension prefer the familiar, concrete, and conventional.

З теорії П'ятифакторна модель →

Відкритість до досвіду
The HEXACO model's Openness to Experience dimension (Ashton & Lee, 2004) comprises aesthetic appreciation, inquisitiveness, creativity, and unconventionality, reflecting the tendency to become absorbed in the beauty of art and nature, be curious about various knowledge domains, use imagination freely, and take an interest in unusual ideas or people. Closely corresponds to FFM Openness, though it emphasizes unconventionality as a distinct facet.

З теорії Модель структури особистості HEXACO →

Відчужений-інтровертований (FG)
Low dominance, low affiliation — quiet, private, reserved (Wiggins, 1995).

З теорії Міжособистісний циркумплекс →

Відчуття спільноти на роботі
The atmosphere between colleagues and the feeling of being part of a community at the workplace — the social fabric dimension of the work environment (Burr et al., 2019).

З теорії Психосоціальні фактори праці →

Внутрішня мотивація до досягнення
Engaging in an activity for the satisfaction of surpassing oneself and creating or accomplishing something (Vallerand et al., 1992). The fuel is progress that can be felt: the distance between what a person could do before and what they can do now, rather than any reward attached to it.

З теорії Теорія самодетермінації →

Внутрішня мотивація до переживання стимуляції
Engaging in an activity for the sensations it produces: absorption, excitement, the pull of material that carries a person along (Vallerand et al., 1992). The most state-dependent of the three intrinsic motivations, and usually the first to fade under exhaustion.

З теорії Теорія самодетермінації →

Внутрішня мотивація до пізнання
Engaging in an activity for the pleasure and satisfaction of learning, exploring and understanding something new (Vallerand et al., 1992, on Deci & Ryan's self-determination theory). The most autonomous end of the continuum: the activity pays for itself while it happens, and needs no outcome to justify it.

З теорії Теорія самодетермінації →

Вплив на роботі
The degree of say a worker has over decisions concerning their own work, including the amount of work and how it is done. A classic buffering resource in the demand-control tradition: the same demands weigh differently with and without it (Karasek & Theorell; Burr et al., 2019).

З теорії Психосоціальні фактори праці →

Впливові інші
Belief that powerful people control outcomes and events in one's life (Levenson, 1981).

З теорії Локус контролю →

Генералізована самоефективність

Також відомо як: General Self-Efficacy · GSE

A broad and stable sense of personal competence to cope effectively with a variety of stressful or novel demands, rooted in Bandura's (1977, 1997) social cognitive theory. As operationalized by Schwarzer and Jerusalem (1995), generalized self-efficacy extends beyond task-specific beliefs to capture the optimistic self-belief that one can handle unforeseen challenges, recover from setbacks, and persist in the face of adversity across diverse life domains.

З теорії Соціально-когнітивна теорія →

Горизонтальна довіра
Whether employees in general trust each other. A workplace social capital dimension: trust between colleagues makes information move and cooperation cheap, and its absence taxes every interaction (Burr et al., 2019).

З теорії Психосоціальні фактори праці →

Громадянська позиція/Командна робота
The character strength of loyalty to a group and pulling one's weight in something collective (Peterson & Seligman, 2004). It is not sociability — it often shows up in people who dislike parties — and a low score can mean independence rather than distance.

З теорії Класифікація сильних сторін характеру «Цінності в дії» →

Гумор
Making jokes about the situation or treating it with lightness to reduce its weight (Carver, 1997). An emotion-focused strategy that changes the stance toward the stressor rather than the stressor itself.

З теорії Транзакційна модель копінгу →

Гумор/Грайливість
The character strength of liking to laugh and to bring smiles to other people — producing lightness, not merely appreciating it (Peterson & Seligman, 2004). Its clearest expression is producing it when things are grim.

З теорії Класифікація сильних сторін характеру «Цінності в дії» →

Депресивний афект
The first of Radloff's four CES-D factors (1977, p. 397): the core dysphoric mood — feeling sad, depressed, lonely, fearful, and unable to shake off the blues. Descriptive grouping for report prose; not a scored scale.

З теорії Епідеміологічна симптоматика депресії →

Депресивні симптоми
Current depressive symptomatology as frequency of symptoms over the past week (Radloff, 1977): depressed mood, feelings of guilt and worthlessness, helplessness and hopelessness, psychomotor retardation, loss of appetite, and sleep disturbance, with the deliberate inclusion of positive affect whose absence is part of depression that pure symptom lists miss. A state expected to move with life events, read against published screening cutoffs — never a diagnosis.

З теорії Епідеміологічна симптоматика депресії →

Депресія
In the DSM-5 cross-cutting symptom framework, depression is assessed as a transdiagnostic symptom dimension that screens for the presence and severity of depressed mood and diminished interest or pleasure across psychiatric disorders, regardless of primary diagnosis (APA, 2013). As a dimensional measure, it captures the frequency of depressive symptoms over a two-week period to supplement categorical diagnosis and inform clinical decision-making about co-occurring symptomatology.

З теорії Наскрізна модель симптомів DSM-5 →

Депресія

Також відомо як: Dysphoria · Low Positive Affect

In Lovibond and Lovibond's (1995) tripartite model as operationalized in the DASS, depression is conceptualized as an emotional syndrome characterized by dysphoria, hopelessness, devaluation of life, self-deprecation, lack of interest or involvement, anhedonia, and inertia. Corresponding to the low positive affect component of Clark and Watson's (1991) tripartite model, this construct emphasizes the loss of motivation and the inability to experience pleasure as its defining features.

З теорії Трипартитна модель депресії, тривожності та стресу →

Диспозиційний оптимізм
A generalized tendency to expect positive outcomes — the stable personality dimension associated with better coping, health, and well-being (Scheier, Carver & Bridges, 1994).

З теорії Диспозиційний оптимізм →

Діяльність з усвідомленістю
Attending to one's current activities rather than operating on autopilot or behaving mechanically (Baer et al., 2006).

З теорії П'ятиаспектна модель усвідомленості →

Доброзичливість
A Big Five personality dimension reflecting individual differences in cooperation, prosocial orientation, trust, and concern for social harmony (Costa & McCrae, 1992). It comprises facets of trust, straightforwardness, altruism, compliance, modesty, and tender-mindedness, with high scorers tending to assume positive intentions in others and prioritize interpersonal warmth over personal gain.

З теорії П'ятифакторна модель →

Доброзичливість
The HEXACO model's Agreeableness dimension (Ashton & Lee, 2004) comprises forgivingness, gentleness, flexibility, and patience, reflecting the tendency to overlook others' wrongdoings, be lenient in judging others, accommodate to the wishes of others, and control one's temper. It differs from FFM Agreeableness by incorporating anger-proneness (moved from Neuroticism) and excluding morality-related content (moved to Honesty-Humility), making it a narrower construct focused on interpersonal tolerance and emotional equanimity.

З теорії Модель структури особистості HEXACO →

Доброта / Щедрість
The character strength of doing favors and good deeds for others as a disposition rather than a transaction (Peterson & Seligman, 2004). What separates the two is patience with other people's problems and kindness that does not keep score.

З теорії Класифікація сильних сторін характеру «Цінності в дії» →

Доброта до себе
Being warm and understanding toward oneself during suffering or failure rather than harshly self-critical (Neff, 2003).

З теорії Теорія самосупчуття →

Доброчесність / Чесність
The character strength of speaking the truth and presenting oneself in a genuine way (Peterson & Seligman, 2004). Its real content is the expensive case: keeping one's word, and the truth, when doing so costs something.

З теорії Класифікація сильних сторін характеру «Цінності в дії» →

Довіра працівників до ефективності систем безпеки
The workgroup's shared perception that the safety systems — training, safety representatives, safety rounds, early planning of safety — actually work (Kines et al., 2011). High trust means the systems are used and participated in; low trust means they run as theatre, fully staffed and quietly ignored.

З теорії Клімат безпеки праці →

Допитливість
The character strength of taking interest in ongoing experience for its own sake — the breadth of appetite for the new (Peterson & Seligman, 2004). It sits close to love of learning without being the same: curiosity opens the door, love of learning keeps a person in the room.

З теорії Класифікація сильних сторін характеру «Цінності в дії» →

Дослідницький

Також відомо як: I

Holland's Investigative type: vocational interest in working with ideas — experiments, diagnosis, evidence, questions actually answered (Holland, 1997; Rounds et al., 2016). High I profiles do their best work one step back from the action; the construct does not require a lab coat — analysis lives in finance, medicine, code, and repair shops alike.

З теорії Професійні інтереси →

Досягнення
The mastery pillar — making progress toward goals, achieving objectives, and feeling competent in handling responsibilities (Seligman, 2011).

З теорії Модель процвітання PERMA →

Драйв BAS
Persistent pursuit of desired goals — motivation to succeed, lead, and excel (Carver & White, 1994).

З теорії Теорія чутливості до підкріплення →

Духовність
The character strength of holding coherent beliefs about a higher purpose and the meaning of life (Peterson & Seligman, 2004). It is deliberately wide, covering religious belief and a secular sense of purpose alike; a low score describes a worldview, not a deficiency in one.

З теорії Класифікація сильних сторін характеру «Цінності в дії» →

Екстраверсія
A Big Five personality dimension reflecting an energetic approach toward the social and material world, encompassing sociability, assertiveness, activity, excitement-seeking, warmth, and the tendency to experience positive emotions such as enthusiasm, joy, and energy (Costa & McCrae, 1992). High scorers are drawn to social interaction and stimulation, while low scorers (introverts) prefer solitary activities and quieter environments.

З теорії П'ятифакторна модель →

Екстраверсія
The HEXACO model's Extraversion dimension (Ashton & Lee, 2004) encompasses social self-esteem, social boldness, sociability, and liveliness, reflecting positive self-regard, confidence in leading or addressing groups, enjoyment of social gatherings, and the experience of enthusiasm and energy. While broadly similar to FFM Extraversion, it places somewhat greater emphasis on self-confidence and social assuredness as core components.

З теорії Модель структури особистості HEXACO →

Емоційна підтримка
Seeking comfort, understanding, and moral support from other people (Carver, 1997). An emotion-focused use of one's social network, distinct from instrumental support, which seeks help with the problem itself.

З теорії Транзакційна модель копінгу →

Емоційні вимоги
The extent to which work places the worker in emotionally disturbing situations or requires dealing with other people's personal problems. An exposure reading characteristic of care, teaching, and service work (Burr et al., 2019).

З теорії Психосоціальні фактори праці →

Емоційність
The HEXACO model's (Ashton & Lee, 2004) counterpart to Big Five Neuroticism, encompassing facets of fearfulness, anxiety, dependence, and sentimentality, and reflecting the tendency to experience fear of physical danger, worry about minor problems, need emotional support from others, and form strong emotional bonds. Unlike FFM Neuroticism, HEXACO Emotionality excludes anger-related content (placed under HEXACO Agreeableness) and includes prosocial emotional sensitivity such as empathic concern and attachment.

З теорії Модель структури особистості HEXACO →

Емпатійна турбота
Other-oriented feelings of sympathy, tenderness and protectiveness toward people going through difficulty (Davis, 1980). The affective dimension pointed outward, at the other person, and the one closest to what everyday language calls a good heart.

З теорії Багатовимірна модель емпатії →

Енергійність
The energy facet of work engagement: high levels of energy and mental resilience while working, the willingness to invest effort, and persistence in the face of difficulties (Schaufeli & Bakker, 2003). It is typically the first facet to sag under chronic overload — often before anything feels wrong — which makes low vigor with intact dedication an early signal rather than a character flaw.

З теорії Залученість до роботи →

Ентузіазм/Життєва енергія
The character strength of approaching life with excitement and energy — feeling alive and activated (Peterson & Seligman, 2004). It is the strength most tied to physical state, so a low reading is worth interpreting alongside sleep, health, and recent months rather than as a fixed trait.

З теорії Класифікація сильних сторін характеру «Цінності в дії» →

Ерудиція
Vocational interest in reading, writing, languages, and the handling of ideas in words (Pozzebon et al., 2010). It sits close to Analysis without being the same: one wants the mechanism, the other wants the expression.

З теорії Професійні інтереси →

Загальна задоволеність роботою
The global evaluative judgment of one's job as a whole — a pleasurable emotional state resulting from the appraisal of one's work (Locke, 1976) — measured directly rather than by summing facet satisfactions such as pay, supervision, or colleagues. As operationalized by the MOAQ-JSS (Cammann et al., 1983), it captures the overall verdict the job's pieces add up to; it moves more slowly than mood and is distinct from momentary affective states at work.

З теорії Настанови щодо роботи →

Задоволеність життям
A global cognitive judgment of one's life as a whole, reflecting the extent to which a person perceives their life circumstances as matching their personal standards and ideals (Diener et al., 1985). Distinct from momentary affect or domain-specific satisfaction.

З теорії Теорія суб'єктивного благополуччя →

Задоволеність роботою
Overall satisfaction with the job — work prospects, pay, and the job as a whole, everything taken into consideration. The summary evaluation that the other work environment dimensions feed (Burr et al., 2019).

З теорії Психосоціальні фактори праці →

Залученість
The flow pillar — being fully absorbed, interested, and engaged in activities and life (Seligman, 2011).

З теорії Модель процвітання PERMA →

Заперечення
Refusing to believe that the stressor is real, or acting as if it has not happened (Carver, 1997). An avoidance-oriented strategy that relates to higher distress in adjustment research (Carver, 1997).

З теорії Транзакційна модель копінгу →

Зарозумілий-розважливий (BC)
High dominance, low affiliation — competitive, cutting, sharp-tongued (Wiggins, 1995).

З теорії Міжособистісний циркумплекс →

Здатність до відновлення
The ability to recover from stress, adversity, or difficult life events — conceptualized as a trait-like capacity reflecting how quickly and effectively one returns to baseline functioning after being disrupted (Smith et al., 2008).

З теорії Теорія резильєнтності →

Здатність любити
The character strength of valuing close relationships and being able both to give and to receive affection and care (Peterson & Seligman, 2004). The receiving side is often the harder half: accepting care means letting someone else matter that much.

З теорії Класифікація сильних сторін характеру «Цінності в дії» →

Здатність прощати/Милосердя
The character strength of forgiving those who have done wrong and giving people a second chance (Peterson & Seligman, 2004). It is about what happens after being hurt: whether the account closes or stays open.

З теорії Класифікація сильних сторін характеру «Цінності в дії» →

Зміни збудливості та реактивності

Також відомо як: Cluster E · Hyperarousal

Criterion E of the DSM-5 four-cluster PTSD model captures marked changes in arousal and reactivity associated with the traumatic event, manifesting as irritable or aggressive behavior, reckless or self-destructive behavior, hypervigilance, exaggerated startle response, concentration difficulties, and sleep disturbance (APA, 2013). Two or more symptoms must be present, reflecting a state of heightened physiological alertness.

З теорії Чотирикластерна модель ПТСР за DSM-5 →

Зовнішня регуляція
Acting for consequences that come from outside: pay, credentials, requirements, the expectations of others (Vallerand et al., 1992). The least autonomous of the regulations and the most fragile — it stops when the reward does — which says nothing against it, since it carries most of the world's obligations.

З теорії Теорія самодетермінації →

Зрозумілість ролі
Whether the work has clear objectives, known areas of responsibility, and explicit expectations. High clarity lets energy go to the work itself instead of to decoding what counts (Burr et al., 2019).

З теорії Психосоціальні фактори праці →

Ідентифікована регуляція
Acting because the activity serves goals the person personally endorses, even when the activity itself is not enjoyable (Vallerand et al., 1992). Extrinsic by definition — the reason lies in an outcome — yet self-determination theory treats it as the most sustainable of the extrinsic regulations, because the reason is the person's own.

З теорії Теорія самодетермінації →

Ізоляція
Feeling cut off and isolated in one's suffering, as if one's problems are uniquely personal — the negative pole of common humanity (Neff, 2003).

З теорії Теорія самосупчуття →

Імпульсивний пошук гострих відчуттів
Acting on impulse, doing unpredictable and spontaneous things without planning (Zuckerman, 1994).

З теорії Пошук відчуттів →

Індивідуалізована підтримка
The leader behavior of showing respect and attention to each follower's personal needs and feelings (Podsakoff, MacKenzie, Moorman & Fetter, 1990): consulting people before decisions land on them, adapting to the individual, and keeping track of what is going on beyond the task list. It is the behavior leaders most reliably overrate in themselves.

З теорії Трансформаційна поведінка лідера →

Інструментальна підтримка
Seeking advice, information, or practical help from other people about what to do (Carver, 1997). The problem-focused counterpart of emotional support: the network is used to act on the situation rather than to feel better about it.

З теорії Транзакційна модель копінгу →

Інтелектуальна стимуляція
The leader behavior of challenging followers to rethink old problems and settled assumptions, the leader's own included (Podsakoff, MacKenzie, Moorman & Fetter, 1990). Where it is high, precedent is not an argument and disagreement with the leader is survivable; where it is low, a well-aligned team solves this year's problems with last year's playbook.

З теорії Трансформаційна поведінка лідера →

Інтернальність
Belief that outcomes are determined by one's own actions and efforts (Levenson, 1981).

З теорії Локус контролю →

Інтроєктована регуляція
Acting under pressure that has moved indoors: guilt, shame, self-worth and the need to prove something to oneself (Vallerand et al., 1992). Genuinely motivating and genuinely costly, it can produce years of effort alongside a persistent sense that none of it was enough.

З теорії Теорія самодетермінації →

Інтрузія

Також відомо як: Cluster B · Re-experiencing

Criterion B of the DSM-5 four-cluster PTSD model encompasses re-experiencing symptoms in which the traumatic event is involuntarily relived through recurrent intrusive memories, distressing nightmares, dissociative flashback reactions, intense psychological distress upon exposure to trauma-related cues, and marked physiological reactions to reminders of the event (APA, 2013). At least one intrusion symptom must be present for PTSD diagnosis.

З теорії Чотирикластерна модель ПТСР за DSM-5 →

Кількісні вимоги
The mismatch between the volume of work and the time available to perform it — tasks piling up, work left undone, insufficient time. A core demand dimension of the psychosocial work environment (Burr et al., 2019); high scores indicate exposure to work overload.

З теорії Психосоціальні фактори праці →

Когнітивна рефлексія
The disposition to notice an intuitive answer, distrust it, and check it before committing (Frederick, 2005). It is measured with problems engineered so that the wrong answer feels finished, which is why the arithmetic is deliberately light: the difficulty sits in suppressing the first response, not in producing it. The construct correlates with measures of cognitive ability without being one — it is a habit of verification, and the ordinary human result is that the planted answer usually wins.

З теорії Двопроцесна теорія міркування →

Комунікація з питань безпеки, навчання та довіра до компетентності колег у питаннях безпеки
The workgroup's shared perception of whether safety knowledge actually circulates — risks discussed when they appear, help exchanged, lessons drawn from what goes wrong, and co-workers' safety competence taken seriously (Kines et al., 2011). It is the mechanism dimension of the workgroup side: commitment supplies the will, communication turns it into shared practice.

З теорії Клімат безпеки праці →

Конвенційний

Також відомо як: C

Holland's Conventional type: vocational interest in organizing data and processes — records kept right, inventories that balance, systems where nothing falls through (Holland, 1997; Rounds et al., 2016). Organizations run on high C people and habitually forget to say so; precision work here is the something, not a stepping stone.

З теорії Професійні інтереси →

Контроль над робочим часом
The worker's control over the timing of their own work — deciding when to take a break, taking holidays roughly when wanted, leaving the workplace for private business. Small time freedoms measured as a distinct resource dimension (Burr et al., 2019).

З теорії Психосоціальні фактори праці →

Конфлікт між роботою та особистим життям
Whether work drains so much energy, and takes so much time, that it negatively affects private life. The spillover dimension of the work-family conflict tradition: the job's cost measured where it lands outside work (Burr et al., 2019).

З теорії Психосоціальні фактори праці →

Креативність
Vocational interest in writing, performing, design, and art as working activities rather than as tastes (Pozzebon et al., 2010). It asks about making, not appreciating: enjoying music and wanting to play it professionally are different answers, and this construct is about the second.

З теорії Професійні інтереси →

Лідерство
The character strength of encouraging a group to get things done while maintaining good relations within it (Peterson & Seligman, 2004). It is about making a group work, not about authority or being in front.

З теорії Класифікація сильних сторін характеру «Цінності в дії» →

Лідерство
Vocational interest in directing, persuading, and being the one who decides — the appetite for leading rather than the skill at it (Pozzebon et al., 2010). High scorers are drawn to roles that own outcomes in public; a low score is not passivity, since many people want real influence over the work with no interest in owning the outcome visibly.

З теорії Професійні інтереси →

Любов до навчання
The character strength of mastering new skills, topics, and bodies of knowledge for their own sake, outside any requirement (Peterson & Seligman, 2004). It differs from curiosity in duration: curiosity opens the door, this strength keeps the person in the room.

З теорії Класифікація сильних сторін характеру «Цінності в дії» →

Макіавеллізм
A strategic, calculating orientation toward other people: planning ahead, managing what others know, choosing alliances for what they yield, and waiting for the right moment (Christie & Geis, 1970; measured alongside the other two traits by Jones & Paulhus, 2014). The dimension describes patience and manipulation together, which is why it predicts success in negotiation and a slow erosion of the trust that cannot be strategized into existence. It is subclinical: everyone sits somewhere on it.

З теорії Темна тріада особистості →

Міжособистісні труднощі
The fourth of Radloff's four CES-D factors (1977, p. 397): the social perception component — feeling that people were unfriendly or disliked you. Descriptive grouping for report prose; not a scored scale.

З теорії Епідеміологічна симптоматика депресії →

Можливості для розвитку
Whether the work offers the possibility of learning new things and using one's skills and expertise. A resource dimension of the work environment: work that neither stretches nor draws on the worker is a documented path to disengagement (Burr et al., 2019).

З теорії Психосоціальні фактори праці →

Надання належного прикладу
The leader behavior of setting an example consistent with the values and standards the leader asks of others (Podsakoff, MacKenzie, Moorman & Fetter, 1990). People read what a leader does faster than they hear what a leader says, so this behavior decides whether instructions arrive with support or against a counter-example.

З теорії Трансформаційна поведінка лідера →

Надія/Оптимізм
The character strength of expecting the best in the future and working to achieve it (Peterson & Seligman, 2004). It is expectation, not cheerfulness: a default forecast that leans favorable, as opposed to rehearsing the bad outcome.

З теорії Класифікація сильних сторін характеру «Цінності в дії» →

Надмірна ідентифікація
Becoming consumed by and merged with one's negative feelings, losing perspective on the broader context — the negative pole of mindfulness (Neff, 2003).

З теорії Теорія самосупчуття →

Наполегливість зусиль
The tendency to work hard and persist despite setbacks, obstacles, and failures — the stamina component of grit (Duckworth & Quinn, 2009).

З теорії Теорія ґриту →

Нарцисизм
Grandiosity, a sense of being special, and a running need for admiration (Raskin & Hall, 1979; measured alongside the other two traits by Jones & Paulhus, 2014). Confidence recruits attention and attention feeds confidence, which is part of why the trait persists; the exposure is the dependence on the mirror, since criticism or someone else's turn in the light registers as injury. The subclinical trait measured here is not narcissistic personality disorder, which is a clinical diagnosis made by a professional through interview.

З теорії Темна тріада особистості →

Наявність сенсу
The extent to which one perceives one's life as having a clear sense of purpose, significance, and comprehensibility (Steger et al., 2006). Presence of meaning is associated with greater well-being, life satisfaction, and psychological adjustment.

З теорії Концептуальна рамка сенсу життя →

Небезпечний пошук гострих відчуттів
Attraction to physically dangerous activities and situations involving risk of injury (Zuckerman, 1994).

З теорії Пошук відчуттів →

Невпевнений-покірний (HI)
Low dominance — soft-spoken, modest, deferential (Wiggins, 1995).

З теорії Міжособистісний циркумплекс →

Невпевненість у збереженні роботи
Worry about becoming unemployed and about how difficult it would be to find another job. A documented stressor that acts well before — and whether or not — any job is actually lost (Burr et al., 2019).

З теорії Психосоціальні фактори праці →

Невпевненість щодо умов праці
Worry about unwanted changes to the conditions of the job — being transferred, having the schedule changed, or pay reduced against one's will. Insecurity about the shape of the job, distinct from insecurity about keeping it (Burr et al., 2019).

З теорії Психосоціальні фактори праці →

Негативні зміни в пізнанні та настрої

Також відомо як: Cluster D · NACM

Criterion D of the DSM-5 four-cluster PTSD model captures persistent negative changes in thinking and emotional experience that began or worsened after trauma, including inability to recall key features of the event, exaggerated negative beliefs, distorted blame, persistent negative emotional states, diminished interest, feelings of detachment, and inability to experience positive emotions (APA, 2013). Two or more symptoms must be present.

З теорії Чотирикластерна модель ПТСР за DSM-5 →

Нейротизм

Також відомо як: Emotional Stability (reversed)

A Big Five personality dimension reflecting the tendency to experience frequent and intense negative emotions including anxiety, anger, sadness, guilt, and self-consciousness, as well as heightened emotional reactivity to stress (Costa & McCrae, 1992). Often conceptualized on a continuum with Emotional Stability at the opposite pole, high Neuroticism is associated with interpreting ordinary situations as threatening and experiencing negative emotional reactions that persist for unusually long periods.

З теорії П'ятифакторна модель →

Нелегітимні завдання
The share of work tasks that seem unnecessary to the person performing them. The operational reading of illegitimate tasks — work experienced as an offence to one's professional sense of self (stress-as-offence-to-self tradition; Burr et al., 2019).

З теорії Психосоціальні фактори праці →

Нереактивність на внутрішній досвід
Allowing thoughts and feelings to come and go without getting caught up in or carried away by them (Baer et al., 2006).

З теорії П'ятиаспектна модель усвідомленості →

Обачність
The character strength of being careful about one's choices and considering consequences before acting (Peterson & Seligman, 2004). A low score is not carelessness: liking risk is a preference, not a failure to notice that it exists.

З теорії Класифікація сильних сторін характеру «Цінності в дії» →

Опис
Labeling internal experiences with words — the ability to articulate feelings, thoughts, and sensations verbally (Baer et al., 2006).

З теорії П'ятиаспектна модель усвідомленості →

Організаційна справедливість
Whether conflicts are resolved in a fair way and the work is distributed fairly — the perceived fairness of the organization's procedures, a workplace social capital dimension (Burr et al., 2019).

З теорії Психосоціальні фактори праці →

Організованість
Vocational interest in budgets, schedules, records, and the administrative machinery that keeps an operation from drifting (Pozzebon et al., 2010). High scorers find genuine satisfaction in a system that holds — a different thing from personal tidiness; low scorers are not disorganized, they simply get nothing back from maintaining the structure itself.

З теорії Професійні інтереси →

Оригінальність / Креативність
The character strength of thinking of novel and productive ways to do things (Peterson & Seligman, 2004). It is appetite for doing things differently rather than artistic talent; contentment with the method that already works is a preference, not a deficit.

З теорії Класифікація сильних сторін характеру «Цінності в дії» →

Особистісне вигорання
Physical and psychological fatigue and exhaustion experienced by the person, independent of work or client contexts (Kristensen et al., 2005).

З теорії Теорія вигорання →

Особистісний дистрес
Self-oriented anxiety and unease when witnessing another person's suffering (Davis, 1980). Read differently from the other three: a high score does not mean more empathy, it means the sight of pain sets off the observer's own alarm, and energy goes to managing that reaction before it can go to the person in trouble. In the reference model this dimension tends to correlate negatively with the others, which is why no composite empathy score exists.

З теорії Багатовимірна модель емпатії →

Оцінка власних емоцій
The ability to perceive, understand and express one's own emotions (Mayer & Salovey, 1997; Wong & Law, 2002): noticing a feeling while it is happening and being able to tell one state from another. The other three dimensions build on it, because a feeling has to be noticed before it can be used or steadied.

З теорії Чотиривимірний емоційний інтелект →

Оцінка емоцій інших
The ability to perceive and understand the emotions of the people around you (Mayer & Salovey, 1997; Wong & Law, 2002): catching tone shifts, silences, and the gap between what someone says and what their face is doing. Distinct from caring about those emotions, which is what an empathy measure reads.

З теорії Чотиривимірний емоційний інтелект →

Передбачуваність
Whether information arrives when needed — advance notice of important decisions and changes, and all the information required to do the work well. Uncertainty about one's own near future at work is a stressor in its own right (Burr et al., 2019).

З теорії Психосоціальні фактори праці →

Перспектива/мудрість
The character strength of being able to provide wise counsel and to see the world in a way that makes sense to oneself and others (Peterson & Seligman, 2004). It is largely confirmed from the outside — by whether people bring their hard questions to the person.

З теорії Класифікація сильних сторін характеру «Цінності в дії» →

Підприємливий

Також відомо як: E

Holland's Enterprising type: vocational interest in persuading and leading — negotiating, deciding, owning outcomes including the risk (Holland, 1997; Rounds et al., 2016). High E profiles often already run things informally wherever they are placed.

З теорії Професійні інтереси →

Планування
Thinking about how to confront the stressor and devising a strategy before acting (Carver, 1997). A problem-focused strategy and the close companion of active coping: one prepares the action, the other carries it out.

З теорії Транзакційна модель копінгу →

Поведінкове відсторонення
Giving up the attempt to deal with the stressor, or abandoning the goals it interferes with (Carver, 1997). It relates to higher distress in adjustment research (Carver, 1997).

З теорії Транзакційна модель копінгу →

Поведінкове гальмування (BIS)
Sensitivity to punishment, novelty, and threat cues producing anxiety and behavioral inhibition (Gray, 1970).

З теорії Теорія чутливості до підкріплення →

Поглинутість
The immersion facet of work engagement: being fully concentrated and happily engrossed in one's work, with time passing quickly and difficulty detaching (Schaufeli & Bakker, 2003). Fed by vigor and dedication it is the pleasure of deep work; standing alone, with the other facets low, it can mean the work has simply swallowed the foreground.

З теорії Залученість до роботи →

Позитивне переформулювання
Reinterpreting the situation in a more positive light, looking for something good in what is happening (Carver, 1997). A meaning-changing strategy that relates to lower distress in adjustment research (Carver, 1997).

З теорії Транзакційна модель копінгу →

Позитивний афект
The second of Radloff's four CES-D factors (1977, p. 397): the presence or absence of positive feeling — feeling as good as other people, hopeful, happy, enjoying life. Measured through reverse-keyed items so that rarely feeling happy raises the score the same way often feeling sad does. Descriptive grouping for report prose; not a scored scale.

З теорії Епідеміологічна симптоматика депресії →

Позитивні емоції
The hedonic pillar of well-being — the frequency of pleasant emotional states such as joy, contentment, and serenity (Seligman, 2011).

З теорії Модель процвітання PERMA →

Послідовність інтересів
The tendency to maintain sustained interest and commitment to a specific domain or goal over extended periods, resisting the pull of novel alternatives (Duckworth & Quinn, 2009).

З теорії Теорія ґриту →

Потреба в пізнанні
The tendency to engage in and enjoy effortful cognitive activity — seeking out, engaging in, and enjoying complex thinking tasks (Cacioppo & Petty, 1982).

З теорії Потреба в пізнанні →

Поширений психічний дистрес
Non-psychotic distress read as one field rather than sorted into diagnoses: low mood, worry and tension, and the bodily complaints that usually arrive with them (headaches, poor sleep, poor appetite, a bad stomach, shaking hands, tiredness that does not lift). The construct exists because in general health care the two halves show up together and separating them costs more information than it buys. It is a state tied to a recent window, not a trait, and it has no universal threshold: how many complaints amount to a probable case depends on the language, the population and what the screening is for.

З теорії Поширені психічні розлади в первинній медичній допомозі →

Пошук веселощів BAS
Impulsive approach toward novel and exciting stimuli — desire for new experiences and spontaneity (Carver & White, 1994).

З теорії Теорія чутливості до підкріплення →

Пошук сенсу
The active pursuit of purpose and significance in life — the degree to which one is actively exploring, questioning, or striving to establish meaning (Steger et al., 2006). Search and presence are partially independent; one can search while possessing or lacking meaning.

З теорії Концептуальна рамка сенсу життя →

Працьовитість / Наполегливість
The character strength of finishing what one starts and persisting in a course of action despite obstacles (Peterson & Seligman, 2004). It is the strength most likely to be praised by others and least likely to be enjoyed by its owner.

З теорії Класифікація сильних сторін характеру «Цінності в дії» →

Прийняття
Accepting the reality of the situation and learning to live with it (Carver, 1997). Within the transactional model, strategies are evaluated by their fit to the situation rather than as universally good or bad (Lazarus & Folkman, 1984), and acceptance is the strategy addressed to what cannot be changed.

З теорії Транзакційна модель копінгу →

Прийняття перспективи
The cognitive tendency to reconstruct how a situation looks from where another person stands, with their information and their stakes (Davis, 1980). The dimension of the model that behaves most like a skill: it improves with deliberate practice and costs effort a person may skip when tired or certain they are right.

З теорії Багатовимірна модель емпатії →

Пріоритет безпеки та неприйняття ризику серед працівників
The workgroup's shared perception of whether safety outranks getting the job done fast — whether hazards are treated as unacceptable or as a normal cost of the work, and risk-taking as competence (Kines et al., 2011). High scores describe a group that does not accept risk-taking; low scores describe normalized risk, which rarely announces itself.

З теорії Клімат безпеки праці →

Пріоритетність, прихильність і компетентність керівництва щодо безпеки
The workgroup's shared perception of whether management genuinely prioritizes safety when it competes with production pressure, is committed to it, and handles it competently (Kines et al., 2011). It reads the collision, not the policy: what management rewards when safety costs something. Low scores contaminate the other dimensions, because workers calibrate to what management actually prioritizes rather than to what it posts.

З теорії Клімат безпеки праці →

Продуманий пошук гострих відчуттів
Willingness to take controlled risks — confident risk-taking with awareness of potential outcomes (Zuckerman, 1994).

З теорії Пошук відчуттів →

Психічне благополуччя
Positive mental well-being as the proportion of a recent period spent in five positive states: cheerful and in good spirits, calm and relaxed, active and vigorous, waking rested, and finding daily life filled with things that interest you (WHO, 2024; DepCare Project, 1998). It is defined by presence, not by the absence of symptoms, which is why a low reading is an absence of positive states rather than a symptom count. A current state that moves with circumstances, read against a published cutoff and never as a diagnosis.

З теорії Позитивне психічне благополуччя →

Психологічна безпека команди
The shared belief that a team is safe for interpersonal risk taking — admitting a mistake, asking for help, disagreeing out loud, proposing unfinished ideas (Edmondson, 1999). It is a property of the team climate rather than an individual trait, and is theorized as distinct from team cohesiveness and from trust in specific individuals. Where safety is high, information moves fast and problems surface while they are small; where it is low, the taxed behaviors are minimized and errors go unreported rather than unmade.

З теорії Психологічна безпека команди →

Психопатія
Impulsivity and thrill seeking combined with low empathy and little remorse (Hare's tradition, in the subclinical operationalisation of Jones & Paulhus, 2014). Of the three, it is the one most consistently linked to the harshest outcomes, and also the one that reads as composure in a crisis. The score describes where impulse and distance are doing the deciding, on a dimension the general population varies along; it is not a forensic finding and not a clinical category.

З теорії Темна тріада особистості →

Ранковість
The position of a person's internal clock on the morning-to-evening continuum: how early the body wants to wake, when sleep actually arrives, and when mind and muscles reach their best (Horne & Östberg, 1976). Morning and evening types differ in the timing of body temperature, melatonin and alertness, not in discipline. The middle is not indecision — intermediate types are the most common and the most flexible about schedule — and the position shifts across the lifespan rather than being fixed.

З теорії Ранковість-вечірність (циркадна типологія) →

Реалістичний

Також відомо як: R

Holland's Realistic type: vocational interest in working with things — building, repairing, operating, testing — work whose result is tangible (Holland, 1997; Rounds et al., 2016). People high on R are often worn down not by effort but by abstraction: a whole day about the work instead of in it.

З теорії Професійні інтереси →

Регуляція емоцій
The ability to regulate one's own emotions, recovering quickly from psychological distress (Mayer & Salovey, 1997; Wong & Law, 2002). Not suppression: steady people still feel the spike, they get their hands back on the wheel sooner. Of the four dimensions, the one that responds most directly to practice.

З теорії Чотиривимірний емоційний інтелект →

Релігія / Духовність
Turning to religious or spiritual beliefs and practices in search of comfort and guidance (Carver, 1997). It can function both as emotional support and as a source of meaning for the situation.

З теорії Транзакційна модель копінгу →

Ризик вживання алкоголю
The risk carried by a person's current pattern of drinking, read across three things at once: how much and how often they drink, whether the drinking has begun to run itself (not stopping once started, needing a morning drink, blackouts), and whether it has already cost something (guilt, failed obligations, injury, other people saying so). It is graded rather than binary, and it is deliberately about a pattern over a period rather than about a person: the same reading can describe a stretch of months that ends. Because the questions are transparent, the measurement is easy to understate on purpose, which limits what a low reading can prove and leaves a high one hard to explain away.

З теорії Небезпечне та шкідливе вживання алкоголю →

Розсудливість / Широта поглядів
The character strength of thinking things through, examining them from all sides, and weighing evidence before deciding (Peterson & Seligman, 2004). It is deliberation rather than intelligence: the disposition to slow down and look for the other side on purpose.

З теорії Класифікація сильних сторін характеру «Цінності в дії» →

Розширення повноважень щодо безпеки з боку керівництва
The workgroup's shared perception of whether management empowers and involves workers in safety — consulting the people closest to the risk, trusting their judgment, and backing them when they exercise it (Kines et al., 2011). High empowerment goes with rules that fit the work; low empowerment goes with rules made at a distance and quietly renegotiated on the floor.

З теорії Клімат безпеки праці →

Рольові конфлікти
Exposure to contradictory demands at work and to tasks one believes should be done differently. A property of how the role is designed — work that argues with itself (Burr et al., 2019).

З теорії Психосоціальні фактори праці →

Садизм
Everyday sadism: finding other people's suffering appealing rather than merely tolerable (Buckels, Jones & Paulhus, 2013; added to the dark traits as the fourth member by Paulhus, 2014). The distinction from psychopathy is about reward and not about severity, in the source article's own words: where psychopathy is indifferent to suffering, sadism finds it attractive. In the subclinical population where it is studied, most of what the construct picks up is vicarious, an appetite for watching conflict in sport, in fiction and in games, together with a taste for cutting remarks. It is a continuous dimension of ordinary personality, not a diagnosis and not a forensic category, and research on subclinical samples has found little sign of psychological dysfunction attached to it.

З теорії Темна тріада особистості →

Самовідволікання
Turning to other activities — work, entertainment, daydreaming — to take one's mind off a stressor (Carver, 1997). Within the transactional model of coping (Lazarus & Folkman, 1984) it manages the emotional response rather than the situation, offering relief without changing the demand.

З теорії Транзакційна модель копінгу →

Самозвинувачення
Criticizing and blaming oneself for what happened (Carver, 1997). It relates to higher distress in adjustment research (Carver, 1997), which distinguishes it from taking responsibility as a step toward action.

З теорії Транзакційна модель копінгу →

Самомоніторинг
The tendency to monitor and control one's expressive behavior and self-presentation in social situations (Snyder, 1974).

З теорії Самомоніторинг →

Самоосуд
Being harshly critical and intolerant of one's own shortcomings and inadequacies — the negative pole of self-kindness (Neff, 2003).

З теорії Теорія самосупчуття →

Самооцінка

Також відомо як: Global Self-Esteem · Self-Worth

A global evaluative attitude toward the self, defined by Rosenberg (1965) as the individual's overall positive or negative orientation toward oneself as a totality, encompassing feelings of self-worth, self-respect, and self-acceptance. High self-esteem reflects the belief that one is 'good enough' without necessarily considering oneself superior, while low self-esteem is associated with self-rejection and a pervasive lack of self-respect.

З теорії Теорія Я-концепції →

Самооцінка здоровʼя
The worker's general rating of their own health, from excellent to poor. A single-item measure with a long epidemiological record as a predictor of health outcomes; in the COPSOQ III it provides individual context for the environmental dimensions (Burr et al., 2019).

З теорії Психосоціальні фактори праці →

Саморегуляція
The character strength of regulating what one feels and does — discipline over appetites and impulses, and the ability to forgo a present pleasure for a future good (Peterson & Seligman, 2004). It is the strength people most often wish were higher.

З теорії Класифікація сильних сторін характеру «Цінності в дії» →

Сенс
The purpose pillar — perceiving one's life as purposeful, valuable, and directed toward something greater than oneself (Seligman, 2011).

З теорії Модель процвітання PERMA →

Сенс роботи
Whether the work is experienced as meaningful and important. One of the strongest sustaining resources a job can offer; its absence makes even light work heavy (Burr et al., 2019).

З теорії Психосоціальні фактори праці →

Скромність-щирість (JK)
Low dominance, high affiliation — tolerant, accepting, honest (Wiggins, 1995).

З теорії Міжособистісний циркумплекс →

Скромність/смирення
The character strength of letting one's accomplishments speak for themselves (Peterson & Seligman, 2004). It is not low self-regard: the question is whether accomplishments need an audience, and a low score is not arrogance — some people simply enjoy being seen.

З теорії Класифікація сильних сторін характеру «Цінності в дії» →

Соматична та загальмована активність
The third of Radloff's four CES-D factors (1977, p. 397): the bodily and psychomotor side of depression — being bothered by things, poor appetite, effort in everything, restless sleep, trouble concentrating, inability to get going. Descriptive grouping for report prose; not a scored scale.

З теорії Епідеміологічна симптоматика депресії →

Соціальна підтримка від керівника
How often help, support, and a willing ear are available from the immediate superior when needed. A support resource that determines whether difficulties escalate to solutions or accumulate (demand-control-support tradition; Burr et al., 2019).

З теорії Психосоціальні фактори праці →

Соціальна підтримка від колег
How often help, support, and a willing ear are available from colleagues when needed. One of the classic protective factors in demanding work; without it, individual difficulties are carried alone (Burr et al., 2019).

З теорії Психосоціальні фактори праці →

Соціальний

Також відомо як: S

Holland's Social type: vocational interest in helping — people changing because you were there: taught, guided, treated, supported (Holland, 1997; Rounds et al., 2016). It is not extraversion: one can love helping and still need silence afterwards; the content reflects sustained one-on-one impact more than social buzz.

З теорії Професійні інтереси →

Соціальний / Емоційний інтелект
The character strength of being aware of the motives and feelings of other people and knowing what to say and do in social situations (Peterson & Seligman, 2004). It is the reading, not what is done with it — it is not the same as warmth and does not have to be used kindly.

З теорії Класифікація сильних сторін характеру «Цінності в дії» →

Спільна людяність
Recognizing that suffering and personal inadequacy are part of the shared human experience, rather than isolating events that happen to oneself alone (Neff, 2003).

З теорії Теорія самосупчуття →

Спостереження
Noticing and attending to internal and external experiences such as sensations, cognitions, emotions, sights, sounds, and smells (Baer et al., 2006).

З теорії П'ятиаспектна модель усвідомленості →

Справедливість щодо безпеки з боку керівництва
The workgroup's shared perception of whether incidents are investigated to find causes rather than culprits, and whether people are treated fairly when they report (Kines et al., 2011). This dimension governs the upward flow of bad news: where justice is perceived as low, incidents do not stop happening — they stop being reported, and the organization loses its early-warning system.

З теорії Клімат безпеки праці →

Справедливість/неупередженість
The character strength of treating all people the same according to notions of fairness and justice, without letting personal feelings bias decisions about others (Peterson & Seligman, 2004). Its real test is consistency under pressure: whether the rules bend for people one likes or dislikes.

З теорії Класифікація сильних сторін характеру «Цінності в дії» →

Сприймана безпорадність
The degree to which life situations are appraised as unpredictable, uncontrollable, and overloading — the core stressor component of perceived stress (Cohen et al., 1983).

З теорії Теорія сприйнятого стресу →

Сприймана самоефективність
The degree to which one feels able to handle problems, control important things, and manage irritations — the coping resource component of perceived stress (Cohen et al., 1983).

З теорії Теорія сприйнятого стресу →

Сприяння прийняттю групових цілей
The leader behavior of promoting cooperation toward a common aim: framing targets as collective, pulling divergent efforts back to the shared goal, and crediting results to the team (Podsakoff, MacKenzie, Moorman & Fetter, 1990). It is what makes coordination cheap, because the goal already belongs to everyone.

З теорії Трансформаційна поведінка лідера →

Стосунки
The social connection pillar — feeling supported, loved, and satisfied with one's personal relationships (Seligman, 2011).

З теорії Модель процвітання PERMA →

Стрес
In the DSM-5 cross-cutting symptom framework, stress-related distress is assessed as a transdiagnostic symptom dimension capturing perceived psychological burden, tension, and difficulty coping, screened alongside other domains to provide a comprehensive picture of psychiatric symptomatology beyond the primary diagnosis (APA, 2013). This dimensional approach recognizes that clinically significant stress responses frequently co-occur with and modulate the course of diverse mental disorders.

З теорії Наскрізна модель симптомів DSM-5 →

Стрес

Також відомо як: Nervous Tension · Irritability

In Lovibond and Lovibond's (1995) tripartite model as operationalized in the DASS, stress is conceptualized as a state of chronic nonspecific arousal characterized by persistent nervous tension, difficulty relaxing, irritability, agitation, impatience, and being easily upset or over-reactive. Corresponding to the negative affect or general distress component shared by both depression and anxiety, this construct captures a sustained state of feeling psychologically overloaded and unable to wind down.

З теорії Трипартитна модель депресії, тривожності та стресу →

Ступінь вираженості генералізованої тривожності

Також відомо як: GAD Anxiety

As operationalized in the GAD-7 (Spitzer, Kroenke, Williams & Löwe, 2006), anxiety severity is assessed by the frequency of seven core symptoms of Generalized Anxiety Disorder specified in DSM-IV: nervousness, uncontrollable worry, excessive worry, restlessness, difficulty relaxing, irritability, and fearfulness.

З теорії Клінічна скринінгова рамка PRIME-MD / PHQ →

Ступінь вираженості депресії

Також відомо як: PHQ Depression

As operationalized in the PHQ-9 and PHQ-2 (Kroenke, Spitzer & Williams, 2001), depression severity is assessed by the frequency of the nine cardinal symptoms of Major Depressive Disorder specified in DSM-IV: anhedonia, depressed mood, sleep disturbance, fatigue, appetite change, guilt/worthlessness, concentration difficulty, psychomotor change, and suicidal ideation. Scores index symptom burden rather than categorical diagnosis.

З теорії Клінічна скринінгова рамка PRIME-MD / PHQ →

Ступінь вираженості соматичних симптомів

Також відомо як: PHQ Somatization

As operationalized in the PHQ-15 (Kroenke, Spitzer & Williams, 2002), somatic symptom severity is assessed by the frequency and bothersomeness of 15 common physical symptoms (headaches, pain, gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, etc.) that account for more than half of all outpatient visits and are often associated with functional impairment.

З теорії Клінічна скринінгова рамка PRIME-MD / PHQ →

Сумлінність
A Big Five personality dimension characterized by individual differences in self-discipline, organization, goal-directed behavior, dependability, and deliberate decision-making (Costa & McCrae, 1992). It encompasses facets of competence, order, dutifulness, achievement striving, self-discipline, and deliberation, and is the strongest and most consistent personality predictor of academic achievement and job performance across cultures.

З теорії П'ятифакторна модель →

Сумлінність
The HEXACO model's Conscientiousness dimension (Ashton & Lee, 2004) comprises organization, diligence, perfectionism, and prudence, reflecting the tendency to organize one's time and physical surroundings, work in a disciplined way toward goals, strive for accuracy and perfection, and deliberate carefully when making decisions. Closely aligned with FFM Conscientiousness in content and structure.

З теорії Модель структури особистості HEXACO →

Схильність до пригод
Vocational interest in competition, physical challenge, and work with real stakes attached (Pozzebon et al., 2010). It is not recklessness: a high score describes someone who is more present when something is on the line, while a low score describes a preference for conditions where attention can go to the work instead of the danger.

З теорії Професійні інтереси →

Темп роботи
The speed the work demands from moment to moment — working very fast and at a high pace throughout the day. Distinct from the volume of work (quantitative demands), it captures sustained work speed as its own exposure (Burr et al., 2019).

З теорії Психосоціальні фактори праці →

Теплий-доброзичливий (LM)
High affiliation — caring, reassuring, interested in others (Wiggins, 1995).

З теорії Міжособистісний циркумплекс →

Товариський-екстравертний (NO)
High dominance, high affiliation — sociable, outgoing, comfortable with people (Wiggins, 1995).

З теорії Міжособистісний циркумплекс →

Тривожність
In the DSM-5 cross-cutting symptom framework, anxiety is assessed as a transdiagnostic symptom dimension that screens for the presence and severity of worry, nervousness, and anxious apprehension across psychiatric disorders, regardless of primary diagnosis (APA, 2013). It captures the frequency of anxiety-related symptoms to identify clinically relevant anxious distress that may co-occur with any primary condition and warrant further evaluation.

З теорії Наскрізна модель симптомів DSM-5 →

Тривожність

Також відомо як: Autonomic Arousal

In Lovibond and Lovibond's (1995) tripartite model as operationalized in the DASS, anxiety is conceptualized as a syndrome of autonomic arousal, skeletal muscle tension, situational anxiety, and the subjective experience of anxious affect. Corresponding to the physiological hyperarousal component of Clark and Watson's (1991) tripartite model, this construct emphasizes somatic and autonomic symptoms as its defining features, distinguishing it from the cognitive and motivational deficits that characterize depression.

З теорії Трипартитна модель депресії, тривожності та стресу →

Тривожність прихильності

Також відомо як: Anxiety dimension of adult attachment

How much a person worries about being left, rejected, or mattering less to close others than those others matter to them: fear of abandonment, monitoring of a partner's availability, and the need for reassurance (Brennan, Clark & Shaver, 1998; Fraley, Waller & Brennan, 2000). A continuous dimension, read as the sensitivity of an alarm rather than as the size of someone's love, and never converted into an attachment type.

З теорії Виміри дорослої прихильності →

Умовна винагорода
The transactional leader behavior of tying recognition and reward clearly and promptly to performance (Podsakoff, Todor & Skov, 1984; measured alongside the transformational behaviors by Podsakoff et al., 1990). An exchange rather than a transformation, and not the opposite of transformational leadership: it is one of the most consistently useful things a leader does, and strong leaders often show both.

З теорії Трансформаційна поведінка лідера →

Уникнення

Також відомо як: Cluster C

Criterion C of the DSM-5 four-cluster PTSD model reflects persistent effortful avoidance of trauma-related stimuli, manifesting as either avoidance of distressing internal reminders (thoughts, feelings, or memories) or avoidance of external reminders (people, places, conversations, activities) that arouse recollections of the traumatic event (APA, 2013). At least one avoidance symptom must be present for diagnosis.

З теорії Чотирикластерна модель ПТСР за DSM-5 →

Уникнення прихильності

Також відомо як: Avoidance dimension of adult attachment

How uncomfortable closeness and dependence feel: reluctance to open up, defensive self-reliance, and unease as intimacy deepens (Brennan, Clark & Shaver, 1998; Fraley, Waller & Brennan, 2000). The dimension measures the price of being seen, not how much a person cares, and it is only moderately related to attachment anxiety, which is why the two are reported apart.

З теорії Виміри дорослої прихильності →

Упевнений-домінантний (PA)
High dominance interpersonal style — assertive, commanding, confident (Wiggins, 1995).

З теорії Міжособистісний циркумплекс →

Усвідомленість
Holding painful thoughts and feelings in balanced awareness rather than suppressing or exaggerating them — a prerequisite for self-compassion (Neff, 2003).

З теорії Теорія самосупчуття →

Фантазія
The tendency to transpose oneself imaginatively into the feelings and actions of fictional characters in books, films and plays (Davis, 1980). Cognitive rather than affective in the model, and less trivial than it sounds: the machinery that lets a novel take over an evening is the machinery used to simulate lives one has never lived.

З теорії Багатовимірна модель емпатії →

Фінансове благополуччя
A state of being wherein a person can fully meet current and ongoing financial obligations, can feel secure in their financial future, and is able to make choices that allow enjoyment of life (CFPB, 2015). The definition is consumer-driven — derived from qualitative research with consumers rather than from expert-set literacy standards — and spans present security, future security, and financial freedom of choice. High scores describe a life with absorbable surprises and a provisioned future; low scores describe margins thin enough that money decides things for the person.

З теорії Фінансове благополуччя →

Формулювання бачення
The leader behavior of identifying new opportunities for the group and communicating a picture of where the work is going that people can see and want to reach (Podsakoff, MacKenzie, Moorman & Fetter, 1990). It is the behavior that turns a direction held in the leader's head into something the team can steer by.

З теорії Трансформаційна поведінка лідера →

Художні інтереси

Також відомо як: A

Holland's Artistic type: vocational interest in creating — making something exist that did not: text, music, images, scenes (Holland, 1997; Rounds et al., 2016). A high A in rigidly structured work is a common source of quiet career misery; a low A is equally informative — briefs, standards, and formats feel like support, not a cage.

З теорії Професійні інтереси →

Цінування краси
The character strength of noticing and being moved by beauty and excellence — in nature, in art, and in skilled performance (Peterson & Seligman, 2004). It describes being interrupted by something well made, not taste or knowledge about art.

З теорії Класифікація сильних сторін характеру «Цінності в дії» →

Чесність-Скромність
A personality dimension unique to the HEXACO model (Ashton & Lee, 2004) that captures individual differences in sincerity, fairness, greed avoidance, and modesty, representing the tendency to be genuine in interpersonal relations, unwilling to manipulate or exploit others for personal gain, and uninterested in lavish wealth or special privileges. Distinct from Big Five Agreeableness, it focuses specifically on moral character and the propensity toward or against exploitation and entitlement.

З теорії Модель структури особистості HEXACO →

Чутливість до винагороди BAS
Positive emotional responses to reward cues — excitement, enthusiasm, and positive anticipation (Carver & White, 1994).

З теорії Теорія чутливості до підкріплення →

Якість керівництва
How good the immediate superior is at the concrete craft of leading — planning the work, solving conflicts, developing people. Read as a working capability of the leader, not charisma (Burr et al., 2019).

З теорії Психосоціальні фактори праці →

Якість роботи
Satisfaction with the quality of the work performed at one's workplace. Measured by a single item in the COPSOQ III middle version; low scores often mark conditions that force work below one's own standard (Burr et al., 2019).

З теорії Психосоціальні фактори праці →

Виміряйте один із них

Більшість цих конструктів вимірюється опублікованим інструментом, який ви можете пройти тут. Проходження безкоштовне, реєстрація не потрібна, джерело та його обмеження зазначено.