Organizational Commitment Assessment
~5 min · 18 questions · Free partial report
Eighteen statements about your relationship with your organization — why you stay, what holds you there, and what leaving would mean. The result breaks commitment into three components: affective (I want to stay), continuance (I need to stay), and normative (I ought to stay). The shape of your profile across all three is more telling than any single score.
Eighteen items measuring why you stay — want, need, or obligation — across three commitment components.
- Measure organizational commitment across three components: affective attachment, perceived switching costs, and felt obligation.
No signup required to start. The Partial Report is free at the end. The Complete costs $50.54, if and when you want it.
What this test measures
Affective Commitment
Continuance Commitment
Normative Commitment
Discover where you stand on each dimension.
Start for free →No prior signup. Free partial result immediately.
From first click to report.
The process is simple: you respond, the system calculates, and the result appears. No prior signup, no form, no waiting.
- 1
Click "Start for free"
No signup required to start. You identify yourself at the end, when you want to save the result. The test opens immediately.
- 2
Answer the questions
Likert 7-point (Strongly disagree to Strongly agree). Visible progress bar. You can pause and resume from any device after identifying yourself.
- 3
Get the Partial Report
Immediate and free. A text summary of each dimension, with indication of high, medium, or low.
- 4
Decide if you want the Complete
The Partial already delivers value. The Complete adds percentiles, norm comparison, charts, applied recommendations, and a verifiable Certificate.
- 5
Explore in the Integrative Chat
Talk to an AI about your results. Ask how your profile applies to your career, what a high score means, or compare with other tests.
The Partial is yours right away. The Complete, when it makes sense.
| Free and paid, side by side | Partial Report (free, always) | Complete Report ($50.54) |
|---|---|---|
| Interpretive text per dimension, generated from your answers | ✓ | ✓ |
| Raw score for each dimension | ✓ | ✓ |
| One-paragraph overview reading | ✓ | ✓ |
| Everything in the Partial, expanded to 3–5 paragraphs per dimension | — | ✓ |
| Percentile per dimension, compared to reference norms | — | ✓ |
| Inter-dimensional chart with accessible data table | — | ✓ |
| Applied recommendations: career, relationships, self-care | — | ✓ |
| Certificate with public verification and PDF download | — | ✓ |
- ✓Everything in the Partial, expanded to 3–5 paragraphs per dimension
- ✓Percentile per dimension, compared to reference norms
- ✓Applied recommendations: career, relationships, self-care
- ✓Certificate with public verification and PDF download
You only pay after completing the test, if you want to go beyond the Partial.
- ✓Interpretive text per dimension, generated from your answers
- ✓Raw score for each dimension
- ✓One-paragraph overview reading
- ✓Free trial of the Integrative Chat, unlocked by your first test
Payment via PIX (instant) or credit card. Access for 1 year. After that, the report stays visible in read-only mode.
What you receive.
Radar chart with percentiles. Illustrative example.
Executive Summary
"You present a profile marked by high intellectual curiosity and above-average conscientiousness, with moderate extraversion and balanced emotional reactivity. This combination suggests someone who seeks novelty in a disciplined way."
Illustrative example.
Scale analysis
The Complete Report details the practical meaning of each score in 3 to 5 paragraphs, personalized by your combined profile. It is not a generic text by range; the analysis crosses all dimensions to generate specific observations about you.
Applied recommendations
Practical recommendations by area (career, relationships, studies, self-care), based on your combined profile. Certificate with verifiable QR and PDF download.
Why trust this instrument.
NOESIS adaptation inspired by Meyer & Allen's (1991) Three-Component Model. Eighteen independently developed items on a 7-point agreement scale measure affective (emotional attachment, 6 items), continuance (switching costs, 6 items), and normative (obligation, 6 items) commitment. Four items are reverse-scored. Meta-analytic reliability: affective alpha .82, continuance .76, normative .73 (Meyer et al., 2002). Scored as mean per subscale (range 1-7).
- Authors:
- Meyer & Allen
- Year:
- 1991
This NOESIS adaptation has not yet been independently validated.
Percentiles and T-scores shown are provisional, based on synthetic reference data until real norms accumulate.
- Meyer, J. P. & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61-89.
The theory behind this test.
Three-Component Model of Organizational Commitment
Organizational commitment as a psychological state with three distinct components: affective commitment (emotional attachment — wanting to stay), continuance commitment (perceived cost of leaving — needing to stay), and normative commitment (sense of obligation — feeling one ought to stay).
Learn more about this theory →Target Audience
Employees and managers who want to understand the nature of their commitment — not just how committed, but why.
Recommended ages: 18+
Questions the report answers.
Do I want to stay?
Affective commitment reflects emotional attachment and identification with the organization. Higher means you genuinely enjoy being part of it.
Do I feel I need to stay?
Continuance commitment reflects the perceived costs of leaving — financial, social, or career. High scores without affective commitment can signal feeling trapped.
Do I feel I should stay?
Normative commitment reflects a sense of duty or obligation — to colleagues, to the company, or to a moral standard. It often comes from how you were treated early on.
Who benefits most.
Employee at a crossroads
Trying to understand whether they stay because they want to, need to, or feel they should.
HR team leader
Using aggregate commitment profiles to understand team retention dynamics.
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between the three types?
Affective = emotional attachment (I identify with this place). Continuance = perceived cost of leaving (I can't afford to go). Normative = sense of obligation (I should stay). People high on affective commitment tend to perform better; high continuance alone predicts stagnation.
Is high commitment always good?
Depends on which type. High affective commitment is associated with better performance and lower turnover. High continuance without affective can mean someone stays but disengages. The profile shape matters more than any single number.
Combine instruments for a fuller profile.
Each test measures different dimensions. The Integrative Chat crosses the results of all tests you complete, revealing connections no single instrument can show.
Work Values Profile
~9 min·36 questions
Twelve work values measured by 36 items, interpreted as personal priorities.
Start for free →Career Decision Self-Efficacy Profile
~7 min·25 questions
Five dimensions of career decision-making confidence, 25 items.
Start for free →Career Futures Profile
~7 min·28 questions
Twenty-eight items measuring career adaptability, optimism, and market knowledge.
Start for free →Career Anchors Profile
~10 min·40 questions
Forty items mapping eight career anchors — the values you would not sacrifice.
Start for free →Organizational Commitment Assessment
No signup, no time limit. The Partial is free at the end.
The Complete costs $50.54, if and when you want it.
This test is a self-knowledge tool for informational purposes. It does not constitute a psychological or clinical diagnosis and does not replace evaluation by a qualified professional. The report indicates the AI model used in text generation.
NOESIS adaptation inspired by Meyer & Allen (1991). Items independently developed.