Attachment Style Assessment
Experiences in Close Relationships-Revised (Fraley, Waller & Brennan, 2000)のNOESIS適応版
~8 min · 24 問 · 無料の簡易レポート
このテストにはセンシティブな内容が含まれています。結果はプライベートであり、明示的に同意しない限り雇用主と共有されることはありません。
Twenty-four statements about how you operate in close relationships: what a slow reply does to your evening, what it costs to let someone see you struggle, how safe it feels to depend on another person. Attachment research describes two dimensions, not boxes: attachment anxiety (how much you worry about being left, rejected, or mattering less to others than they matter to you) and attachment avoidance (how uncomfortable closeness, dependence, and opening up feel). This assessment reads your position on both, separately, because the two scores answer different questions and mix in different ways. It is a NOESIS adaptation built on the adult attachment model measured by the ECR-R (Fraley, Waller and Brennan, 2000): the items are independently written and not independently validated, so treat the result as structured self-reflection rather than a validated diagnosis.
Two dimensions, not four boxes: how fast distance feels like danger, and what closeness costs you.
- Put separate numbers on the two habits that shape your close relationships: the alarm that fires at signs of distance, and the brake that engages when someone comes close. See which specific behaviors drive each score, and take away a vocabulary for conversations that usually run on accusation: 'you are clingy' and 'you are cold' become two positions on a map.
登録不要で開始できます。簡易レポートは最後に無料で提供されます。 完全レポートは$9.90です。必要なときにお支払いください。
このテストで測定されるもの
愛
愛着不安
How much you worry about being left, rejected, or mattering less to close others than they matter to you: fear of abandonment, monitoring of availability, need for reassurance.
愛
愛着回避
How uncomfortable closeness and dependence feel: reluctance to open up, defensive self-reliance, unease when intimacy deepens.
クリックからレポートまで。
手順はシンプルです：回答し、システムが計算し、結果が表示されます。事前登録不要、フォーム不要、待ち時間なし。
- 1
「無料で始める」をクリック
開始時に登録は不要です。結果を保存したいときに、最後に本人確認を行います。テストはすぐに始まります。
- 2
質問に答える
Likert 7-point agreement scale (Strongly disagree to Strongly agree)。進捗バーが表示されます。本人確認後は、どのデバイスからでも中断・再開可能です。
- 3
簡易レポートを受け取る
即座に無料で提供。各次元のテキスト要約と、高・中・低の指標が含まれます。
- 4
完全レポートが必要か決める
簡易レポートだけでも十分な価値があります。完全レポートには、パーセンタイル、基準比較、チャート、応用的推奨、検証可能な修了証が追加されます。
- 5
統合チャットで探求する
AIとあなたの結果について対話できます。プロフィールがキャリアにどう活かせるか、高いスコアの意味、他のテストとの比較などを尋ねられます。
簡易レポートはすぐにあなたのものに。完全レポートは必要に応じて。
| 無料版と有料版の比較 | 簡易レポート (常に無料) | 完全レポート ($9.90) |
|---|---|---|
| 回答に基づいて生成された各次元の解釈テキスト | ✓ | ✓ |
| 各次元の素点スコア | ✓ | ✓ |
| 1段落の概要 | ✓ | ✓ |
| 簡易レポートの全内容を、各次元3〜5段落に拡張 | — | ✓ |
| 各次元のパーセンタイル（基準群との比較） | — | ✓ |
| アクセシブルなデータテーブル付きの次元間チャート | — | ✓ |
| キャリア、人間関係、セルフケアへの応用的推奨 | — | ✓ |
| 公開検証とPDFダウンロード付き修了証 | — | ✓ |
- ✓簡易レポートの全内容を、各次元3〜5段落に拡張
- ✓各次元のパーセンタイル（基準群との比較）
- ✓キャリア、人間関係、セルフケアへの応用的推奨
- ✓公開検証とPDFダウンロード付き修了証
テスト完了後、簡易レポートの先に進みたい場合のみお支払いいただきます。
PIX（即時）またはクレジットカードでお支払い。レポートへのアクセスは1年間。その後、レポートは読み取り専用モードで閲覧可能です。
受け取れるもの。
パーセンタイル付きレーダーチャート。説明のための例示。
エグゼクティブサマリー
「あなたは高い知的好奇心と平均以上の誠実性を特徴とするプロフィールを示しており、中程度の外向性とバランスの取れた情緒反応性を持っています。この組み合わせは、規律を持って新しいことを求める人を示唆しています。」
説明のための例示。
尺度分析
完全レポートでは、各スコアの実際的な意味を3〜5段落で詳述し、あなたの総合的なプロフィールに基づいてパーソナライズされます。範囲ごとの一般的なテキストではなく、すべての次元を横断してあなたに特有の観察を生成する分析です。
応用的推奨
あなたの総合的なプロフィールに基づく分野別の実用的推奨（キャリア、人間関係、学業、セルフケア）。検証可能なQR付き修了証とPDFダウンロード。
このツールを信頼できる理由。
Based on the two-dimension model of adult attachment measured by the ECR-R (Fraley, Waller and Brennan, 2000), this assessment uses 24 independently developed items — 12 per dimension, 4 reverse-keyed in each — on a 7-point agreement scale, scored as raw 1 to 7 means with NOESIS-labeled bands and no total score. Reverse-keyed items are turned in the scoring, never by relabeling the answer options. The items were written by NOESIS to represent the published construct and have not been independently validated; the original scale's psychometrics and any published norms do not apply to them. The two scores are always reported separately: the reference literature argues against sorting people into attachment types, so the familiar quadrant names appear at most as a reading aid for the combination.
- 著者:
- Fraley, Waller & Brennan
- 年:
- 2000
- デジタルオブジェクト識別子 — ジャーナル記事への直接リンク。:
- 10.1037/0022-3514.78.2.350
表示されている信頼性、基準、カットオフは、元のツール（Experiences in Close Relationships-Revised (Fraley, Waller & Brennan, 2000)）のものです。
このNOESIS適応版はまだ独立した検証を受けていません。
- Fraley, R. C., Waller, N. G., & Brennan, K. A. (2000). An item response theory analysis of self-report measures of adult attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(2), 350-365.
このテストの背景にある理論。
Adult Attachment Dimensions
Framework describing how adults experience closeness and dependence in intimate relationships, developed from Bowlby's and Ainsworth's attachment theory and extended to adult romantic bonds by Hazan and Shaver (1987). Self-report research converged on two continuous dimensions rather than categories: attachment anxiety (fear of abandonment and rejection, vigilance about the availability of close others) and attachment avoidance (discomfort with closeness, dependence and self-disclosure). Brennan, Clark and Shaver (1998) established the two-factor structure over a large item pool, and Fraley, Waller and Brennan (2000) refined the measurement by item response theory. Taxometric analyses in the same tradition (Fraley & Waller, 1998) support dimensions over attachment types, so positions on the two dimensions are read separately and never converted into a classification.
この理論について詳しく見る →ターゲット
Adults who want an honest read on how they attach: people who keep landing in the same relationship pattern, couples who fight the same fight in different costumes, and single people who want to see the pattern before the next relationship starts.
推奨年齢: 18+
レポートが答える質問。
How fast does distance turn into threat for you?
Read the score as the sensitivity of an alarm, not the size of your love. High means signs of distance (a late reply, a flat tone, a canceled plan) get flagged as danger early and often, and the impulse is to fix the feeling now: check, ask, ask again. Low means the same signals mostly pass without setting anything off. Neither end is virtue; an alarm that never rings misses real fires, and one that rings hourly exhausts the household.
What does closeness cost you?
Read the score as the price of being seen. High means intimacy is spent carefully: feelings stay summarized, help is asked for late or not at all, and the deepest rooms of your inner life stay locked, even to people who have been around for years. Low means openness and depending come cheap. The score does not measure how much you care about people; it measures how expensive it feels to let them all the way in.
最も効果的な方。
The one who rereads the last message
Sent at 21:14, seen at 21:20, no reply by 23:00. The evening reorganizes itself around what that silence might mean. A high anxiety score does not say the worry is wrong; it says the alarm is calibrated to go off early, and shows what it is scanning for.
The partner who needs a day alone after a great weekend
Nothing went wrong; the closeness itself was the exertion. A high avoidance score can name that pattern without the usual courtroom framing: not cold, not uncommitted, but someone for whom being fully seen is expensive, and who pays for it afterwards in solitude.
A couple stuck in pursue and withdraw
One asks for more, the other asks for room, and both are sure the other one started it. Two profiles side by side turn the fight about tone into a diagram of the loop: what each person's move costs the other, and where the cycle can actually be interrupted.
よくある質問
Does this tell me my attachment type?
No, on purpose. The researchers behind the reference model found that attachment differences are a matter of degree, not category: people vary continuously on anxiety and on avoidance, and cutting the scores into types throws information away. Your report gives you a position on each dimension. The familiar labels (secure, preoccupied, dismissing, fearful) appear only as a reading aid for the combination, never as a verdict on what you are.
I am single right now. Can I still take it?
Yes. The statements ask about how you operate in intimate and close relationships in general: partners past and present, and the few people who really know you. You do not need a current partner to have an attachment pattern; it shows in how you remember old relationships, how you handle new closeness, and who you call when something breaks. Taking it between relationships is actually a good moment, because the pattern is easier to see without a specific person attached to every answer.
What is a NOESIS adaptation?
The two dimensions this test measures come from published attachment research, specifically the model behind the ECR-R of Fraley, Waller and Brennan (2000). The 24 statements you answer are NOESIS's own wording: no item text is taken from the original questionnaire, and the original's published statistics (reliability, norms) do not apply to these items. If you need a validated instrument for research, use the original under its own terms; if you want a structured, honest way to look at your own pattern, this is built for that.
My report mentions quadrants like secure or fearful. Is that a diagnosis?
No. The quadrant is a didactic picture of where your two scores land together, and its names are shorthand, not clinical categories. Attachment researchers, including the ECR-R's first author, argue explicitly against classifying people from these scores, and this test follows that position. Nothing in your report is a diagnosis of you or your relationship; if relationship distress is causing real suffering, a couples or individual therapist reads that far better than any questionnaire.
Can my attachment pattern change?
The research tradition treats attachment as stable enough to be worth measuring and plastic enough to be worth working on. Long relationships with reliable people, therapy, and sometimes just naming the pattern move the dial, slowly. What changes fastest is not the reflex but what you do two seconds after it fires: the anxious impulse to demand proof and the avoidant impulse to go quiet both become choices once you can see them coming.
Should my partner and I take it together?
It is one of the best uses of the test. Much couple friction around closeness is two normal patterns colliding: one person reads distance as danger and moves closer, the other reads pursuit as pressure and steps back, and each step confirms the other's fear. Two separate results put that loop on the table in neutral language. Each of you answers alone, then you compare: not to decide who is the problem, but to see which loop your two positions predict.
このテストは情報提供を目的とした自己理解のためのツールです。心理学的または臨床的な診断を構成するものではなく、資格を持つ専門家による評価に代わるものでもありません。レポートにはテキスト生成に使用されたAIモデルが示されます。
© 2026 NOESIS. All items independently developed. Construct based on Fraley, Waller & Brennan (2000); no item text is reproduced from the Experiences in Close Relationships-Revised.