Hazardous and Harmful Alcohol Use
Saunders, J. B., Aasland, O. G., Babor, T. F., de la Fuente, J. R. & Grant, M. · 1993
也被称为: Hazardous drinking · Harmful drinking · AUDIT framework
This framework replaces the binary question of whether someone is alcohol dependent with a graded risk continuum running from low-risk drinking through hazardous use (a pattern that increases the risk of harm) and harmful use (a pattern already causing harm) to probable dependence. The clinical payoff is that the largest group causing population-level harm is not the dependent minority but the much larger hazardous-drinking majority, who are invisible to dependence-focused screening and who respond well to brief intervention. Assessment therefore covers consumption, dependence symptoms and alcohol-related problems as three separate domains.
Framework that separates drinking into a graded risk continuum rather than a yes-or-no diagnosis. It comes from the World Health Organization's ICD-10 vocabulary, where hazardous use is a pattern that raises the risk of harm before any harm has happened, and harmful use is a pattern that has already damaged physical or mental health. Dependence sits beyond both and is a separate category. The point of the distinction is timing: it was built to find people early, in general health care, while the pattern is still cheap to change, which is why the measurement asks about ordinary drinking behaviour instead of about symptoms of illness. Three things get read together and none of them alone: how much and how often a person drinks, whether the drinking has started to run itself, and whether it has begun to cost anything. A reading on this continuum is a screening signal about a pattern of behaviour over a period, not a statement about a person and not a diagnosis.
- 来源:
- Saunders, J. B., Aasland, O. G., Babor, T. F., de la Fuente, J. R., & Grant, M. (1993). Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO Collaborative Project on Early Detection of Persons with Harmful Alcohol Consumption II. Addiction, 88(6), 791-804. Babor, T. F., Higgins-Biddle, J. C., Saunders, J. B., & Monteiro, M. G. (2001). AUDIT: Guidelines for Use in Primary Care (2nd ed.). Geneva: World Health Organization. WHO/MSD/MSB/01.6a.
参加基于此理论的经过验证的测试
阅读关於某个构念的资料能让您了解它是什麼,而经验证的测验工具则能让您了解自己在其中的位置。免费作答,幾分鐘內即可獲得结果。
证据概览
- 实证支持
- 强证据支持
- 重复验证
- 已充分重复验证
- 跨文化性
- 大致具普遍性
- 綜合分析(统合分析)
- 已收录 16 项
这些评等总结了关於该理論已发表的文獻,而非以此理論建构的任何单一测验的品质。它们是根据下方所列来源所作的編輯判斷,並會隨著证据累积而變化。
历史背景
The World Health Organization commissioned the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test in the early 1980s as a cross-nationally valid screen, developed and validated across six countries — Norway, Australia, Kenya, Bulgaria, Mexico and the United States — which is unusual among psychiatric instruments and explains its cross-cultural performance. Saunders and colleagues published the validation in 1993. The shorter AUDIT-C, covering consumption items only, followed in 1998. The instrument is central to the WHO's screening and brief intervention strategy, which has substantial trial evidence behind it.
构念
Alcohol Use Risk
The risk carried by a person's current pattern of drinking, read across three things at once: how much and how often they drink, whether the drinking has begun to run itself (not stopping once started, needing a morning drink, blackouts), and whether it has already cost something (guilt, failed obligations, injury, other people saying so). It is graded rather than binary, and it is deliberately about a pattern over a period rather than about a person: the same reading can describe a stretch of months that ends. Because the questions are transparent, the measurement is easy to understate on purpose, which limits what a low reading can prove and leaves a high one hard to explain away.
工具
- The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test(AUDIT)Saunders, J. B., Aasland, O. G., Babor, T. F., de la Fuente, J. R., & Grant, M. (development, 1993); Babor, T. F., Higgins-Biddle, J. C., Saunders, J. B., & Monteiro, M. G. (manual, 2001); World Health Organization2001
基于此理论的测试
实际应用
AUDIT is used in primary care, emergency departments and occupational health to identify risky drinking early enough for brief intervention to work, and in population surveys to estimate risk distribution. Its four published risk zones map to graded responses: education, brief advice, brief counselling with monitoring, or referral for diagnostic evaluation. Read individually, it locates a drinking pattern on a risk continuum; it does not diagnose an alcohol use disorder, which requires clinical assessment.
如何测量
Ten self-report items across consumption, dependence and harm domains, summed 0 to 40 and read against four published risk zones; screening only, with no diagnostic inference.
批评与局限
All alcohol screening depends on self-reported consumption, which is systematically underreported, and underreporting increases exactly where stakes are highest — employment, driving, custody contexts. The conventional cutoff of 8 performs differently by sex, with evidence supporting a lower threshold for women, and by age; a single universal threshold sacrifices accuracy for simplicity. Drinking patterns and standard-drink definitions vary enough across countries that consumption items are not strictly comparable internationally. AUDIT-C, being consumption-only, misses harm and dependence indicators entirely.
重要文献
- Saunders, J. B., Aasland, O. G., Babor, T. F., de la Fuente, J. R. & Grant, M.. (1993). Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO collaborative project on early detection of persons with harmful alcohol consumption, II. 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1993.tb02093.x
- Babor, T. F., Higgins-Biddle, J. C., Saunders, J. B. & Monteiro, M. G.. (2001). AUDIT: The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test, Guidelines for Use in Primary Care, 2nd edition.
- Bush, K., Kivlahan, D. R., McDonell, M. B., Fihn, S. D. & Bradley, K. A.. (1998). The AUDIT alcohol consumption questions (AUDIT-C): An effective brief screening test for problem drinking. 10.1001/archinte.158.16.1789