Character Strengths Profile (IPIP-VIA-R)IPIP-VIA-R
~20 min · 96 問 · 無料の簡易レポート
A 96-item profile across 24 character strengths, from Curiosity and Gratitude to Prudence and Valor. Four items per strength, half of them worded in reverse so that agreeing with everything does not produce a flattering result. This is a profile, not a ranking: it shows which qualities you recognise in yourself most readily, and the useful reading is the shape of the whole set rather than any single number.
A 96-item profile of 24 character strengths — from Curiosity and Gratitude to Prudence and Valor — with balanced positive and negative keying.
- Find which strengths you recognise in yourself and which you do not, and see them together rather than one at a time. The strengths at the top of your profile tend to be the ones you use without being asked, which is what makes them worth knowing.
登録不要で開始できます。簡易レポートは最後に無料で提供されます。 完全レポートは$14.90です。必要なときにお支払いください。
このテストで測定されるもの
Appreciation of Beauty
Capacity for Love
Citizenship/Teamwork
好奇心
Equity/Fairness
Forgiveness/Mercy
感謝
Hope/Optimism
Humor/Playfulness
Industry/Perseverance
Integrity/Honesty
Judgment/Open-mindedness
Kindness/Generosity
リーダーシップ
学習への愛
Modesty/Humility
Originality/Creativity
Perspective/Wisdom
慎重
Self-regulation
Social/Emotional Intelligence
精神性
Valor/Bravery
Zest/Vitality
クリックからレポートまで。
手順はシンプルです：回答し、システムが計算し、結果が表示されます。事前登録不要、フォーム不要、待ち時間なし。
- 1
「無料で始める」をクリック
開始時に登録は不要です。結果を保存したいときに、最後に本人確認を行います。テストはすぐに始まります。
- 2
質問に答える
Likert 5-point scale (Does not apply at all to Applies completely)。進捗バーが表示されます。本人確認後は、どのデバイスからでも中断・再開可能です。
- 3
簡易レポートを受け取る
即座に無料で提供。各次元のテキスト要約と、高・中・低の指標が含まれます。
- 4
完全レポートが必要か決める
簡易レポートだけでも十分な価値があります。完全レポートには、パーセンタイル、基準比較、チャート、応用的推奨、検証可能な修了証が追加されます。
- 5
統合チャットで探求する
AIとあなたの結果について対話できます。プロフィールがキャリアにどう活かせるか、高いスコアの意味、他のテストとの比較などを尋ねられます。
簡易レポートはすぐにあなたのものに。完全レポートは必要に応じて。
| 無料版と有料版の比較 | 簡易レポート (常に無料) | 完全レポート ($14.90) |
|---|---|---|
| 回答に基づいて生成された各次元の解釈テキスト | ✓ | ✓ |
| 各次元の素点スコア | ✓ | ✓ |
| 1段落の概要 | ✓ | ✓ |
| 簡易レポートの全内容を、各次元3〜5段落に拡張 | — | ✓ |
| 各次元のパーセンタイル（基準群との比較） | — | ✓ |
| アクセシブルなデータテーブル付きの次元間チャート | — | ✓ |
| キャリア、人間関係、セルフケアへの応用的推奨 | — | ✓ |
| 公開検証とPDFダウンロード付き修了証 | — | ✓ |
- ✓簡易レポートの全内容を、各次元3〜5段落に拡張
- ✓各次元のパーセンタイル（基準群との比較）
- ✓キャリア、人間関係、セルフケアへの応用的推奨
- ✓公開検証とPDFダウンロード付き修了証
テスト完了後、簡易レポートの先に進みたい場合のみお支払いいただきます。
PIX（即時）またはクレジットカードでお支払い。レポートへのアクセスは1年間。その後、レポートは読み取り専用モードで閲覧可能です。
受け取れるもの。
パーセンタイル付きレーダーチャート。説明のための例示。
エグゼクティブサマリー
「あなたは高い知的好奇心と平均以上の誠実性を特徴とするプロフィールを示しており、中程度の外向性とバランスの取れた情緒反応性を持っています。この組み合わせは、規律を持って新しいことを求める人を示唆しています。」
説明のための例示。
尺度分析
完全レポートでは、各スコアの実際的な意味を3〜5段落で詳述し、あなたの総合的なプロフィールに基づいてパーソナライズされます。範囲ごとの一般的なテキストではなく、すべての次元を横断してあなたに特有の観察を生成する分析です。
応用的推奨
あなたの総合的なプロフィールに基づく分野別の実用的推奨（キャリア、人間関係、学業、セルフケア）。検証可能なQR付き修了証とPDFダウンロード。
このツールを信頼できる理由。
The IPIP-VIA-R (Bluemke, Partsch, Saucier & Lechner, 2021) measures 24 character strengths from the Values in Action classification (Peterson & Seligman, 2004) using 96 public-domain items from the International Personality Item Pool — four items per strength, two positively and two negatively keyed. The scales were psychometrically refined for content validity, balanced keying, essential unidimensionality and cross-cultural comparability. Reliability was established in quality-filtered quota samples from Germany (N = 476) and the UK (N = 474), with Cronbach's alpha ranging from .45 to .74, McDonald's omega from .57 to .84, and two-to-three-week test-retest reliability from .53 to .84. Factor analysis across the 24 scales yields three global dimensions that capture the essence of character strengths. This is a profile, not a ranking: the useful reading is the shape of the whole set rather than any single number.
- 著者:
- Bluemke, Partsch, Saucier & Lechner; original classification by Peterson & Seligman
- 年:
- 2021
- デジタルオブジェクト識別子 — ジャーナル記事への直接リンク。:
- 10.31234/osf.io/k79qf
- Bluemke, M., Partsch, F., Saucier, G., & Lechner, C. M. (2021). 496 shades of character: IPIP-VIA-R short scales for assessing the 24 VIA character strengths. PsyArXiv. Original classification: Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character Strengths and Virtues: A Handbook and Classification.
このテストの背景にある理論。
Values in Action Classification of Character Strengths
Classification of 24 character strengths organized under 6 core virtues, developed as a positive-psychology counterpart to clinical diagnostic taxonomies.
この理論について詳しく見る →ターゲット
Adults who want a fuller vocabulary for what they are like at their best, whether for their own sake, for writing about themselves, or for a conversation with someone else.
推奨年齢: 16+
レポートが答える質問。
Does beauty stop you, or pass you by?
This is about being interrupted by something well made or naturally striking, not about taste or knowing about art. A high score describes someone whose attention gets caught. A low one describes someone who notices later, or when told, and loses nothing by it.
Can you let yourself be cared for?
The items ask about both directions, and the harder one is usually receiving. Giving affection can be a way of staying in charge of the exchange; accepting it means letting someone else matter that much. A gap between the two is worth sitting with.
Do you belong to the group, or just work near it?
This is loyalty and pulling your weight in something collective, not sociability. A high score often shows up in people who dislike parties. A low score can mean independence rather than distance, and the items about working alone will tell you which.
Is an unfamiliar thing interesting or tiring?
Curiosity here is breadth of appetite: how many different things can hold you. It sits close to Love of Learning and is not the same. This one is about the pull toward the new; the other is about staying with something long enough to know it.
Do the rules bend for people you like?
Everyone says they treat people equally. The items that carry the weight are the reversed ones, about advantage and about treating people differently when you dislike them. A high score here is a claim about consistency under pressure.
What do you do with a grudge?
Not whether you get hurt, but what happens after. High scorers let the account close; low scorers keep it open, which is sometimes accurate bookkeeping and sometimes a weight. The items do not judge which.
Is what you have visible to you?
Gratitude is a habit of noticing rather than a mood. It is one of the few strengths that tends to move with practice, so a low score reads more like a current state than a fixed trait.
Where does your mind go when the outcome is unknown?
This is expectation, not cheerfulness. A high score describes someone whose default forecast leans favourable; a low one describes someone who rehearses the bad outcome. Rehearsing has real uses, and this is not a scale where low means broken.
Is humour something you do, or something you enjoy?
The items ask about producing it, not appreciating it, and specifically about producing it when things are grim. A low score says you are not the one who lightens the room, which is different from having no sense of humour.
What happens to the things you start?
Finishing, specifically, and finishing when the way is blocked. It is the strength most likely to be praised and least likely to be enjoyed, and a high score often comes with a cost the items do not ask about.
Is your word the same when it is expensive?
Promises and secrets are cheap to keep when nothing is at stake. The reversed items are the ones that matter: lying to get out of trouble, and betraying someone who trusted you. A high score is a claim about the expensive case.
Do you look for the other side on purpose?
Weighing and reconsidering, rather than intelligence. A high score describes someone who slows down before deciding. It can be a strength or a way of never deciding, and this scale cannot tell the two apart.
Is helping something you do, or something you do when convenient?
The reversed items ask about impatience with other people's problems and about kindness that keeps score. Those two are what separate a disposition from a transaction.
Can you make a group work without taking it over?
The items are about getting people to work well together, not about authority or being in front. A high score with a low Citizenship score describes someone who organises groups they do not feel part of, which is a real and specific position.
Do you learn things nobody is asking you to learn?
Learning outside of any requirement, for its own sake. It is close to Curiosity and differs in duration: curiosity opens the door, this one keeps you in the room.
Do you need the room to know?
Not low self-regard, which is a different thing entirely. This is about whether your accomplishments need an audience. A low score is not arrogance either; some people simply enjoy being seen, and the items say so plainly.
Do you reach for a new way, or the way that works?
This is appetite for doing things differently, not artistic talent. A low score describes someone who is content with the method that already works, which in most jobs is the more useful disposition.
Do people bring you the hard questions?
Wisdom here is defined from the outside, by whether others come to you for it. That makes it the most socially confirmed of the 24, and the one where self-report is on the weakest ground.
Do you think it through, or find out?
Careful choosing and consequence before action. A low score is not carelessness; the reversed items are about liking risk, which is a preference rather than a failure to notice it exists.
Can you not do the thing you want to do?
Discipline and the ability to forgo a present pleasure for a future good. It is the strength people most often wish were higher, and the items about spending and eating make it concrete rather than abstract.
Do you read the room before you speak in it?
Sensing what others feel and knowing what to say. A high score is not the same as warmth, and does not have to be used kindly. The scale measures the reading, not what you do with it.
Do you believe the whole thing means something?
Deliberately wide: it covers religious belief and a secular sense of purpose alike, and one of the reversed items is about life feeling meaningless. A low score is a description of a worldview, not a deficiency in it.
Do you say it when it costs you?
Standing up when there is opposition, and speaking when the result might be bad for you. Both items name the price, which is what separates this from simply having opinions.
How do you meet the morning?
Energy and appetite for the day ahead. It is the strength most tied to physical state, so a low score is worth reading alongside sleep, health and how the last few months have gone rather than as a fixed trait.
最も効果的な方。
Someone writing about themselves and running out of words
A personal statement, a profile, an answer to what are you good at. The problem is rarely a lack of qualities and usually a lack of names for them.
Someone whose review said good things they did not recognise
Being told you are patient or fair by people who work with you, and not being sure whether to believe it. Seeing which strengths you claim for yourself is one way to hold that up against what others see.
Someone deciding what to protect in a busy period
When time is short, the qualities that get dropped first are usually the ones that were never named. Knowing which ones are yours makes them easier to defend.
よくある質問
Is this the VIA Survey?
No. The VIA-IS is a separate instrument licensed by the VIA Institute on Character. This one is the IPIP's public-domain representation of the same 24 strengths, rebuilt from a different item pool by different authors. Expect the two to broadly agree and to differ in the details, and do not treat a result here as a result there.
Why are my scores not compared to other people?
Because no per-scale averages have been published for this version, and inventing them would be worse than going without. Your score on each strength is the average of your own four answers, so a high score means you recognised those statements in yourself, not that you scored above anyone. That is a smaller claim than a percentile and it is the one the data supports.
Half the statements are negative. Is that a trick?
It is a safeguard, and a deliberate one. If every statement were flattering, a person who tends to agree would come out strong on all 24 and the profile would say nothing. With half the items reversed, agreeing with everything cancels out. It makes the questionnaire slightly more tiring to answer and the result considerably more informative.
Should I aim to be high on all of them?
You will not be, and that is the point. A profile where everything is high usually means the answers described an ideal rather than a person. The strengths you score lowest on are not faults to correct; they are simply not the ones you lead with.
Will my results change if I take it again?
The top and bottom of the profile tend to hold. The middle moves, because a lot of strengths sit close together and a small shift in mood or recent events reorders them. If you retake it, compare the shape rather than the individual positions.
より充実したプロフィールのために、ツールを組み合わせましょう。
各テストは異なる次元を測定します。統合チャットは完了したすべてのテストの結果を横断し、単一のツールでは見えないつながりを明らかにします。
Temperament & Character Profile (IPIP-TCI)
約44分·289 問
Seven dimensions — four temperament, three character — measured through Cloninger's biopsychological model. 289 IPIP items, validated against the original TCI.
無料で始める →Dark Tetrad Test (SD4)
約9分·28 問
Machiavellianism, narcissism, psychopathy and everyday sadism, measured with the 28 published items of the Short Dark Tetrad.
無料で始める →Dark Triad Assessment
約9分·27 問
Machiavellianism, narcissism, psychopathy: everyone sits somewhere on all three. Twenty-seven statements to find out where you do.
無料で始める →Self-Monitoring Test
約3分·10 問
Discover how much you adjust your behavior to fit different social situations.
無料で始める →このテストは情報提供を目的とした自己理解のためのツールです。心理学的または臨床的な診断を構成するものではなく、資格を持つ専門家による評価に代わるものでもありません。レポートにはテキスト生成に使用されたAIモデルが示されます。
This test uses the IPIP-VIA-R short scales from the International Personality Item Pool (IPIP), which are in the public domain. The scales were developed by Bluemke, Partsch, Saucier and Lechner (2021) to represent the 24 character strengths described by Peterson and Seligman (2004). It is not the VIA-IS, which is a separate instrument licensed by the VIA Institute on Character.